Residential air-to-air heat exchangers: Performance energy savings, and economics

Abstract

Residential energy consumption can be decreased if air infiltration is reduced by constructing houses more tightly. In some cases, however, reduced air infiltration can lead to problems with indoor air quality ( e.g., excess humidity and high levels of indoor-generated air contaminants). One solution to this problem is to install a residential air-to-air heat exchanger. The heat exchanger provides a controlled supply of ventilation which counteracts the adverse effects of reduced infiltration. In addition, the heat exchanger recovers much of the energy that would normally be lost when ventilation occurs by air infiltration. Thus, by employing heat exchangers in low-infiltration houses, it is possible to save energy without sacrificing indoor air quality. This paper discusses the performance of residential heat exchangers and summarizes results from tests of several models. It also compares the energy consumed, during the heating season, in low-infiltration houses with heat exchangers, with the energy consumed in typical houses in four cities throughout the United States. For each city, a cost-benefit analysis is performed from the point of view of a home-owner. Houses with natural gas, oil, and electrical heating systems are considered. Our analysis indicates that the energy required to heat ventilation air in homes employing heat exchangers is 5.3 – 18.0 GJ less than the energy required to heat ventilation air in typical homes. In homes with heat exchangers, the heat exchanger's fan system required 2.2 – 3.6 GJ of electrical energy during the heating season. The net present benefit for homes employing heat exchangers, when compared with typical homes, ranged from —$1350 to +$2400 and discounted payback periods ranged from five to over 30 years. The cost-effectiveness of employing heat exchangers was found to be highly affected by climate, type of heating fuel, heat exchanger performance, and ventilation rate.