Resident peripheral nerve surgery competence: An assessment of procedural exposure, self-reported competence and technical ability

Abstract

BackgroundIdentifying peripheral nerve surgery procedure (PNSP) competencies is crucial to ensure adequate resident training. We examine PNSP training at neurosurgical centers in the US and Canada to compare resident-reported competence, PNSP exposure, and resident technical abilities in performing 3 peripheral nerve coaptations (PNC). MethodsResident-reported PNSP competence and PNSP exposure data were collected using questionnaires from neurosurgical residents at North American neurosurgical training centers. Exposure and self-reported competency were correlated with technical skills. Technical PNC variables collected included: time-to-completion, nerve-handling from video-analysis, independent and blinded visual-analog-scale (VAS) PNC quality grading by 3 judges, and training level. ResultsA total of 40 neurosurgical residents participated in the study. Although self-reported competency scores correlated with procedural exposure (P < 0.01, rs = 0.88), a discrepancy was found between the degree of self-reported competency and amount of exposure. The discrepancy was greater in senior residents. A significant VAS difference was found between PNC types with the direct-suture and connector-assister groups scoring higher than connector-only (P = 0.02, P < 0.01, respectively). No difference was observed between training level and VAS grading, nor time-to completion (P = 0.33 and 0.25, respectively). No correlation was found between self-reported competency performing PNSPs and PNC VAS scores, nor nerve handling. ConclusionsDespite more exposure and a higher self-reported PNSP competency in senior residents, no difference was seen between senior/junior residents in PNC quality. A discrepancy in PNSP exposure and self-reported competency exists. This information will provide guidance for the direction of resident PNS training.