Abstract

BackgroundTerritory owners usually defeat intruders. One explanation for this observation is the uncorrelated asymmetry hypothesis which argues that contests might be settled by an arbitrary convention such as “owners win.” We studied the effect of territorial residency on contest asymmetries in the white-eared hummingbird (Hylocharis leucotis) in a fir forest from central Mexico.MethodsTwenty white-eared male adult hummingbird territories were monitored during a winter season, recording the territorial behavior of the resident against intruding hummingbirds. The size and quality of the territory were related to the probability that the resident would allow the use of flowers by the intruder. Various generalized models (logistical models) were generated to describe the probabilities of victory for each individual resident depending on the different combinations of three predictor variables (territory size, territory quality, and intruder identity).ResultsIn general, small and low quality territory owners tend to prevent conspecific intruders from foraging at a higher rate, while they frequently fail to exclude heterospecific intruders such as the magnificent hummingbird (Eugenes fulgens) or the green violetear hummingbird (Colibri thalassinus) on any territory size. Our results showed that the identity of the intruder and the size and quality of the territory determined the result of the contests, but not the intensity of defense.DiscussionInitially, the rule that “the resident always wins” was supported, since no resident was expelled from its territory during the study. Nevertheless, the resident-intruder asymmetries during the course of a day depended on different factors, such as the size and quality of the territory and, mainly, the identity of the intruders. Our results showed that flexibility observed in contest tactics suggests that these tactics are not fixed but are socially plastic instead and they can be adjusted to specific circumstances.

Highlights

  • Individuals who arrive first and establish ownership status in a given area containing resources seem to have a competitive advantage known as “prior-residence” (Kokko, Lopez-Sepulcre & Morrell, 2006)

  • We investigated the effect of territory residence in contest asymmetries in natural conditions using the white-eared hummingbird (Hylocharis leucotis) as a model

  • Our study focused on three of the seven hummingbird species recorded in the NPEC (Ortiz-Pulido & Vargas-Licona, 2008), the white-eared hummingbird (H. leucotis), the magnificent hummingbird (Eugenes fulgens), and the green violet-ear (Colibri thalassinus), resident species in the study area

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Individuals who arrive first and establish ownership status in a given area containing resources seem to have a competitive advantage known as “prior-residence” (Kokko, Lopez-Sepulcre & Morrell, 2006) This phenomenon may be the result of an “uncorrelated assymetry” (Smith & Parker, 1976; Smith, 1982), such that all (or the majority) of the individuals in a population follow the rule “residents win” Krebs, 1982; Tobias, 1997; Kemp & Wiklund, 2004) This rule prevents potentially harmful fights, alternative explanations suggest that its stability depends on asymmetries in fighting ability or resource value. Our results showed that flexibility observed in contest tactics suggests that these tactics are not fixed but are socially plastic instead and they can be adjusted to specific circumstances

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call