Abstract
Knowledge workers (KW), as important individual agents who embody, exchange, create and exploit knowledge, contribute to regional competitiveness and growth. To attract and retain them in a region, it is necessary to have a better understanding of their fundamental spatially-related behaviors including residence, workplace, and commute choices. In this study, we depart from a perspective of knowledge typology (analytical-synthetic-symbolic knowledge base) to investigate the heterogeneity of knowledge workers' residence, workplace, and commute choices. The case study was conducted in the metropolitan region of Munich. Various types of data are integrated: structural statistical and individually-based web-survey data; individuals' actual choices and their assessment of importance for each criterion; positional and relational data. We find that symbolic Advanced-Producer-Services (APS) workers tend to reside in central areas and use public transport or active modes to commute. In contrast, synthetic high-tech workers are found in relatively peripheral areas and depend more on cars to reach their workplaces. The spatially-related choices of analytical high-tech and synthetic-APS workers are positioned in between symbolic APS-workers and synthetic high-tech workers. We reach three conclusions: Firstly, the features of the knowledge base are evident in the spatial choices of knowledge workers. Secondly, there is a consistency of characteristics between interrelated spaces surrounding residence, workplace, as well as along the commute path of knowledge workers. Lastly, while the influence of the knowledge base has to be weighed against socio-demographic factors, different groups of knowledge workers clearly display distinct choices of residential location and commute mode. These conclusions may provide insights for urban planners and policy-makers regarding the attraction and retention of knowledge workers.
Highlights
Knowledge has become a crucial factor for production in the era of knowledge economies (Simmie, 2002)
The share of individuals who reside in central areas and use public transport to commute is largest among symbolic APS-workers
One quarter of synthetic APS-workers live in central areas and commute with public transport and another quarter live in peripheral areas and use cars to commute
Summary
Knowledge has become a crucial factor for production in the era of knowledge economies (Simmie, 2002). Exchanging and creating knowledge often require face-to-face interaction between knowledge agents in “a specific time and space” As individual agents who embody, exchange, create, and exploit knowledge, are indispensable resources for innovation and forces for regional development (Vissers and Dankbaar, 2013). We define knowledge workers based on their employment sector and the complexity of their professional tasks. Knowledge workers work in high-tech industries or advanced-producerservices (APS), which are two main pillars of the knowledge economy (Lüthi et al, 2010; Thierstein et al, 2008). Knowledge workers perform non-routine or highly complex tasks, and fulfill important functions in their organizations Knowledge workers perform non-routine or highly complex tasks, and fulfill important functions in their organizations (Brinkley et al, 2009; Bundesagentur für Arbeit, 2010, p. 27)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
