Abstract
The simplistic view of Mathematics as a logical system of formal truths deduced from a limited set of axioms by a limited set of inference rules immediately shatters when confronted with the history of Mathematics, or current mathematical practice. To become useful, mathematical Philosophy should contemplate what Mathematics actually was, over centuries, and what it is now, rather than speculate what it should be according to the philosophical orthodoxy. The first dogma that must be completely revised is the idea of proof as a text, rather than what it is for mathematicians themselves: a process, a plethora of interwoven arguments, a multi-dimensional structure. This article is part of the theme issue 'The notion of 'simple proof' - Hilbert's 24th problem'.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
