Abstract

The injection of sulfate-containing seawater into an oil reservoir, for maintaining the reservoir pressure, can promote the growth of sulfate reducing bacteria and archaea near the injection wells, leading to the formation of sulfides such as hydrogen sulfide. However, intermediate sulfur species with different valence states, such as polythionates and polysulfides have been detected in several produced water samples, likely a result of phase partitioning, and chemical and microbial reactions. These sulfur species could affect the microbial communities (e.g., microbially influenced corrosion) and will impact the efficiency of souring mitigation methods. In addition, the presence of these sulfur species can result in operational, environmental, and treatment problems. Therefore, development and implementation of souring control strategies during production cycle of oil and gas reservoirs require identifying the origins, reactivity, and the partitioning behaviour of these compounds. This paper presents an overview of the known mechanisms responsible for reservoir souring and then focuses on the chemical reactions and sulfur species associated with production and consumption of hydrogen sulfide. In this work we highlight complexity of the sulfur chemistry and that the assumption that all the sulfate is reduced to hydrogen sulfide can lead to inappropriate souring management methods. The paper also reviews the detection and analysis methods used for sulfur compounds. The review demonstrates that there is a gap in the current souring models and methods due to the exclusion of key sulfur compounds and challenges in identifying and quantifying these compounds with respect to speed of analysis and sample stability.

Highlights

  • The injection of sulfate-containing seawater for maintaining the pressure of oil reservoirs can promote the growth of sulfate reducing bacteria (SRB) and archaea near the injection wells, leading to the reduction of sulfate to sulfide (Holubnyak et al 2011; Khatib and Salanitro 1997; Stemler 2012; Voordouw et al 2007; Kaster et al 2007; Machel 2001; Hubert 2010)

  • Subsequent biologically and chemically mediated reactions result in the formation of elemental sulfur as well as other reduced sulfur compounds

  • The objective of this paper is to provide a comprehensive review of research findings in sulfur chemistry in oil reservoirs at low to moderate temperatures to highlight the importance of understanding the sulfur chemistry in determining the full extent of reservoir souring

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The injection of sulfate-containing seawater for maintaining the pressure of oil reservoirs can promote the growth of sulfate reducing bacteria (SRB) and archaea near the injection wells, leading to the reduction of sulfate to sulfide (Holubnyak et al 2011; Khatib and Salanitro 1997; Stemler 2012; Voordouw et al 2007; Kaster et al 2007; Machel 2001; Hubert 2010). Subsequent biologically and chemically mediated reactions result in the formation of elemental sulfur as well as other reduced sulfur compounds. The analysis of produced water samples has shown the presence of other sulfur species such as thiosalts, sulfite, and polysulfides along with sulfide (Witter and Jones 1998; Boulegue et al 1981). The average oxidation state of these sulfur species is. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology (2019) 9:1105–1118 O2 O2 SO42- S2O32- Fe3+ Fe3+ O2 SO32O2 SO32- Sx2-

Objectives
Findings
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.