Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to present an example of pedagogical strategy, called innovation pedagogy, and study whether its learning environments (activating teaching and learning methods, working life orientation and research, development and innovation (RDI) integration, multidisciplinary learning environments, flexible curricula, entrepreneurship and internationalization) can be associated with students’ innovation competences (creativity, critical thinking, initiative, teamwork and networking).Design/methodology/approachIn this case study, the electronic self-assessment questionnaire was distributed to third- and fourth-year bachelor students (n=236) from one Finnish university of applied sciences at the end of the Spring semester in 2017.FindingsTwo profiles of students concerning their level of innovation competences can be identified. The level of students’ innovation competences is associated with all the six elements of learning environments. The more students have experience with learning environments of innovation pedagogy, the higher they scored when assessed for their innovation competences.Research limitations/implicationsBecause of the case study setting and a limited sample, there are limitations to the generalizability of the findings.Originality/valueFocusing on different levels of innovation competences of students and approaching their study path in more detail, it could be better understood how to develop more effective education, and thus, respond to the demands of an innovation society. This study extends approaches on research in education and innovation and strengthens the understanding that learning environments should be versatile and include many-sided learning opportunities. It also shows that implementing pedagogical strategy needs lot of work to be revealed in practice.

Highlights

  • All sectors of the economy emphasize the importance of innovations

  • According to him, when reforming education there is a growing call to base educational decision making on high-quality educational research and pedagogical practices generating efficient learning (Michael, 2006). To respond to these claims, the aim of this paper is to present an example of pedagogical strategy, called innovation pedagogy, and study whether learning environments built according to it can be associated with students’ innovation competences

  • This study focuses on examining whether there are different student profiles concerning their level of innovation competences and how these students differ based on their study experience of varying learning environments

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Businesses and organizations are continuously looking for innovative employees. Companies need innovations to create competitiveness and the public sector needs innovations to produce high-quality and cost-efficient services. Innovative individuals are the resource of all innovations and higher education represents a critical factor in human capital development (Avvisati et al, 2013; Edwards-Schachter et al, 2015; Vila et al, 2012). The role of higher education is to educate undergraduates for future work and to train future employees to perform work tasks, which generate innovations. Regardless of context, are expected to prepare innovative individuals capable of coping with the twenty-first century demands (Avvisati et al, 2013; Trilling and Fadel, 2009). A renewed EU agenda for higher education institutions (European Commission, 2017)

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call