Abstract
The public land management in the United States has experienced these processes: extensive management to encourage land privatization—beginning to pay attention to the protection of public lands—protective development of public land. This article aims to explore the similarities and differences between China and the United States in the management of public land. From the perspective of organization, law and public interest, it provides reference for China’s land management theory and practice. This paper found that at present, the features of public land management in USA are sound management institutions, complete laws and regulations, strict land use management system, strict implementation of paid land use, and implementation of public regulation of non-ownership. The legal system of land in the United States, the strict programming of land planning and the land property and market system are worthy of learning.
Highlights
The United States is a highly developed country with vast territory, abundant resources, but few people
This paper found that at present, the features of public land management in USA are sound management institutions, complete laws and regulations, strict land use management system, strict implementation of paid land use, and implementation of public regulation of non-ownership
In order to strengthen the function of public land management, as early as 1903, the federal government set up the Federal Land Reclamation Bureau under the Ministry of agriculture to ensure the most adequate, effective and lasting use of public land and all kinds of resources attached to it
Summary
The United States is a highly developed country with vast territory, abundant resources, but few people. The natural and geographical conditions of the 50 states vary in different ways. America is quite different from China in terms of natural, social environment and system, its management system in public land still has a realistic reference. Because of the great political, social and economic differences between China and the United States, the experience of land management cannot be copied. The article is organized as follows: introduction of history of American land management; analysis of the characteristics of the current system of public land management in US; suggestions of the reference to China based on American public land management; summary
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: American Journal of Industrial and Business Management
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
