Abstract
The endless prisoner's dilemma game is described as a "primer" using the perspectives of the bilateral parties. Current research focuses on which player responds most effectively, which is a kind of self-protect behavior. Content analysis and mathematical justification were undertaken for the prisoners dilemma iteration to understand better how to improve the game in a partially competitive and cooperative collaborative setting. This aims to apply the two-side strategies to the real world, especially the political events in which the whole human outcome should be maximized. Participants, who were mostly chosen from game theory specialists from an experiment, provided the decision parameters and rules, in which they have to decide among certain personal strategy choices. The comparisons findings show that two-sided cooperation produces the best results. Still, two-sided inaction results in the poorest, and single cooperation and single noncooperation result from personal sacrifice and personal selfishness, which is a psychological phenomenon.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
