Abstract

Currently, PTFE/Al is widely used in the reactive fragmentation warhead. However, for the same explosive yield, the reactive fragments usually have a smaller damage-radius than the inert fragments because PTFE/Al has a poor penetration ability and needs an impact-speed up to 1000 m/s to stimulate its chemical reaction. To enhance the damage power of reactive fragments, six kinds of reactive materials (PTFE/Al, PTFE/B, PTFE/Si, PTFE/Al/B, PTFE/Al/Si, and PTFE/Al/CuO) based on PTFE were designed and studied. Through the drop weight system and the self-designed energy release test device, qualitative and quantitative analysis of the energy release ability of six kinds of reactive materials were carried out. The qualitative analysis results indicate that the reactions of PTFE/B and PTFE/Si are weak under the impact of drop hammer with only a very weak fire light produced, while the reactions of PTFE/Al, PTFE/Al/B, PTFE/Al/Si, and PTFE/Al/CuO are relatively intense, and the reaction of PTFE/Al/Si is the most intense. Through the self-designed energy release test device, the energy release ability of the reactive material was quantitatively compared and analyzed. The results show that the energy release ability of the four formulations were as follows: PTFE/Al/Si > PTFE/Al/CuO > PTFE/Al/B > PTFE/Al. Therefore, it can be concluded that the PTFE/Al/Si formulation is a new reactive material with strong energy release ability, which can be a new choice for reactive fragment.

Highlights

  • Reactive material has been widely studied for more than 40 years [1] and the metal/polymer mixture type reactive materials showed great superiority in the application of weapons and equipment [2].Metal/polymer mixture type reactive materials are usually composed of two or more metal particles and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)

  • The results show that the experimental results of PTFE/Al/W under the impact of drop weight are consistent with the description of the Zerilli–Armstrong constitutive equation, and it was found that the main reason for the crack generation and propagation in the sample is due to the debonding and separation between the PTFE matrix and W particles

  • The specific test methods included: drop weight test to qualitatively the release energy of reactivemainly materials and the traditional new independent design energy qualitatively analyze the release of reactive materials and the new independent design energy release test device based on the energy drop weight system to quantitatively analyze the release energy of release test device based on the drop weight system to quantitatively analyze the release energy of reactive materials

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Reactive material has been widely studied for more than 40 years [1] and the metal/polymer mixture type reactive materials showed great superiority in the application of weapons and equipment [2]. Metal/polymer mixture type reactive materials are usually composed of two or more metal particles and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) This type of materials is relatively insensitive under normal conditions, but, under high strain rate loading or high-pressure collision conditions, violent chemical reactions will occur and release a lot of chemical energy [3,4]. Some characteristics of the metal/polymer mixture type reactive material are similar to conventional explosives, but the reactive material has better mechanical properties than the explosive, and the overall performance of the external impact loading conditions is blunt, high energy. Ames found that the higher the impact loading speed is, the higher the energy release rate of the material is [12], the PTFE/Al reactive material has lower risk than conventional explosives [13]. Six kinds of reactive materials were designed and tested for their energy release ability under low-speed impact, and the results can provide reference for the formulation design of reactive materials

Formulation Design of Reactive Materials
Energy Release Ability Test of Reactive Materials
Qualitative Energy Release Test
Physical
Quantitative Energy Release Test
The principle of
The piston displacement–time curve corresponding to the four formulations:
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call