Abstract
The aim of this paper is to present three factors about how post-truth can be spread through some classical examples. Firstly, rumors during the epidemic period in China not only serves as a way for media platforms to attract the publics attention, but they are also spread to help netizens express their emotions and alleviate stress. In addition, confirmation bias, a tendency that people normally have, also plays a role in creating post-truth. Secondly, the paper talked about two current ways of identifying post-truth news. However, after evaluation, both wayshaving critical thinking and using technological tools or have their drawbacks. Furthermore, opinion leaders should be properly regulated by related personnel. To conclude, the authority and credibility of the news should be improved, and the problems of post-truth are worth keeping a watchful eye on.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
