Abstract
Currently, innovation is no longer limited to a single enterprise. The joint realization of collaborative innovation by multiple parties has become the main driving force for innovation and development. The Power Innovation Park is an emerging innovation and entrepreneurship model. It is guided by power grid companies, and the school, government, and enterprise are combined in the park. The Power Innovation Park urgently needs theoretical guidance in terms of the resource allocation mechanism, support incentive mode, and benefit-sharing mode, so this paper takes the park as an example to study the benefit-sharing mode of collaborative innovation. In this paper, the transformation methods of the Power Innovation Park are divided into two types: cooperation between members within the park and dominated by external enterprises in the park. This paper applies cooperative game theory and HJB equation to study the benefit-sharing model of each member in the Power Innovation Park under two different result transformation modes. Research has shown that an appropriate method of transformation of results can maximize the overall and individual interests of the park and that individual interests are affected by many factors. Finally, this paper puts forward policy recommendations to promote the collaborative innovation development of the innovation park through the research results.
Highlights
Introduction e Power InnovationPark is an emerging industrial park that is driven by a collaborative innovation mechanism
The benefit-sharing model is established for different transformation modes. is paper briefly describes the conditions for selecting the transformation mode of achievement, proves that the appropriate transformation mode can maximize the benefits, and probes into the main factors affecting the benefit-sharing of members under different transformation modes
Taking the multiagent internal member cooperation model and external enterprise-led model as an example, the benefit-sharing model based on cooperative games is constructed. (2)
Summary
When π ≤ P, the transformation method led by external enterprises in the park should be adopted, and the specific transformation method can be transfer or implementation of license In this way, technological achievements are transferred to enterprises outside the park, and the transfer income is the total income of the technology. (5) In the external enterprise-led model, under any strategy combination, the income pi of each unit in the park can be quantified, and the total utility corresponding to the income of each member in the park can be expressed through the Cobb–Douglas function. If pi satisfies formula (6), the strategy combination corresponding to this income is a feasible strategy combination s#, where P is the total income of the benefit distribution game, that is, the opportunity cost of the internal member cooperative transformation method.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
