Abstract

As a surface-strengthening technology, electro-spark deposition (ESD) is widely used in the strengthening and repair of key components of high-end equipment. In this paper, a fusion and solidification model of ESD coating is established. The method of heat–fluid–solid interaction is adopted to simulate the material’s flow and fusion process in the droplet dropping into the molten pool. The distribution law of the coating-matrix material inside the coating was studied. Through the heat transfer between the molten material and the matrix material, the condensation and solidification process of the coating-matrix material is simulated, the temperature change in the coating area during the solidification process is analyzed, and the solidification law of the molten material is studied. The results show that the deposition time reaches 80 μs, and the content of electrode material at the bottom of the molten pool reaches 4.5%. The content of electrode material in the upper region of the material gushing out of the molten pool is higher than that in the bottom region. The material outside the molten pool solidifies first, and the molten material in the molten pool gradually solidifies from the bottom up; the shape of the solidification interface is similar to the boundary of the molten pool. Through the single-point deposition experiment of electro-spark deposition, the surface morphology of the deposition point was observed. The depth of the concave part of the contour can reach 16 μm. The difference between the two contour curves in the horizontal direction is not much; the error of the diameter is about 4%. The element distribution of the surface and the section of the deposition point are analyzed. The diffusion distance in the depth direction of the coating is about 4μm, and the transverse diffusion distance inside the coating is 364 μm. The error is 7.6% compared with the experimental results. The cross-section structure of the deposition point was observed, and the error between the experimental results and the simulation results in diameter is about 11%. It was found that the material distribution in the sedimentary area is basically consistent with the simulation results, and the simulation results are verified from the side.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call