Abstract

Retention approaches in forest management are today common in several North European countries, integrated into the clearcutting practice as a way to promote biodiversity and maintain ecosystem functions. Individual green trees and retention patches (tree groups) are retained at final harvest, and deadwood is left at site or created. Here, we review research on retention in Sweden, Finland, Norway, the Baltic States, and NW Russia, with special focus on biodiversity. Following the first publication in 1994, about 180 peer-reviewed articles have been published. We present results from a systematic search of the retention literature, separated into the following topics: buffer zones, retention patches, high stumps, other types of deadwood, European aspen Populus tremula, and cost-efficiency. Russian literature is synthesized separately since studies from this region have so far almost exclusively been published in the Russian language. Furthermore, we describe six ongoing large-scale, replicated experiments with varying retention levels, five in Finland and one in Sweden, and summarize their main results. Among main conclusions for practice from the literature and experiments are that retention patches as large as 0.5 ha and 10-m-wide buffers to watercourses are not enough to maintain pre-harvest species composition but survival of forest species is still larger than on conventional clearcuts. Deadwood on clearcuts may present important habitats to saproxylic species, including rare and red-listed ones and a prioritization of tree species per stand is recommended. We identify several important future research directions including switch of focus towards the landscape as well as the species population level. Surveys in parts of European Russia where retention has been unintentionally implemented already for a century would indicate possible future trajectories of biodiversity and their drivers in other regions of Northern Europe. A stronger link to ecological theory would help in study designs and in the formulation of predicted outcomes.

Highlights

  • Retention forestry is a relatively new forestry management concept in which measures to promote biodiversity are integrated into harvest operations (Gustafsson et al 2012)

  • Conclusions for practice The large amount of research from Northern Europe enables some broad conclusions for practical forest management

  • The importance to biodiversity associated with old forests and elements increases with retention level, i.e., the more that is retained, the better for forest plants, animals and fungi

Read more

Summary

Background

Retention forestry (variable retention, variable retention forestry, retention silvicultural system, retention system, see Beese et al 2019) is a relatively new forestry management concept in which measures to promote biodiversity are integrated into harvest operations (Gustafsson et al 2012). Several studies indicate that species occupancy often increases with increasing substrate density (Komonen et al 2000; Ranius 2002; Sahlin and Schroeder 2010; Rubene et al 2014; Ranius et al 2017) This would call for large habitat patches meaning retention of many stems of the same tree species per clearcut. A Finnish simulation study including different conservation scenarios and using habitat for deadwood-associated species as a proxy for biodiversity, concluded that compared to larger set-aside areas, small retention patches (0.01 ha) are an ineffective way to spend conservation funding (Mönkkönen et al 2011). In a study covering seven consecutive years following harvest, the total number of species and number of threatened species of invertebrates, vascular plants, bryophytes, polypores, and lichens were higher in areas where deadwood and special biotopes (such as paludified patches and creeks) had been retained than on open clearcuts (Romanyuk et al 2009). The most recent Finnish experiment is the “Forest management inspired by natural disturbance dynamics” DISTDYN (W and E Finland; Fig. 2), established in

Experiments Characteristics
Findings
Availability of data and materials Not applicable

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.