Abstract
Evaluating the charging status of power batteries is very important in battery management systems, and the accuracy and parameter identification of battery models are crucial for it. Using DST and FUDS lithium-ion battery dynamic mode datasets for simulation verification, and comparing with particle swarm optimization algorithm, grey wolf algorithm, and genetic algorithm. The simulation results show that this method has advantages in recognition accuracy, with an average quadratic error of 0.0166V for parameter recognition. Compared with other optimization algorithms, it decreased by 7.8%, 8.3%, and 14.9% respectively.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
