Abstract
This article uses the NMNL (nested multinominal logit) model to analyze the impact of different policies on the cost of owning a vehicle by a consumer and discusses the changes in the share of various fuel-driven types of passenger vehicles that may be brought by different policy portfolios. This article also considers the differences in the development of various technical routes, conducts the nested classification calculation of different models, divides the differences in product preferences and obtains the market share results that are more in line with the market development status, providing a basis for the formulation of policies related to new energy vehicles. The study found that the popularization of NEVs requires more cost-reducing measures. As policies that consumers can perceive, consumers are more sensitive to fiscal and taxation policies than other types of policies. Based on the calculation of policy effects, this article recommends a policy plan to gradually impose vehicle purchase tax on NEVs after 2024, increase the fuel tax rate in stages after 2025, and impose an excise tax on BEVs and FCEVs after 2030. The plan can guarantee the stability of support for NEVs and the gradual reduction of financial investment.
Highlights
Since the State Council issued the “Energy-saving and New Energy Vehicle IndustryDevelopment Plan (2012–2020)” in 2012 [1], China has always adhered to the strategic orientation of blade electric driven
It refers to vehicles that adopt new power systems and rely entirely or mainly on new energy sources, including Battery Electric Vehicles (BEVs), Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles (PHEVs) and Fuel Cell Electric Vehicles (FCEVs)
It is necessary to consider the decline in battery cost caused by the advancement of battery technology, decrease in R&D expense for a single vehicle caused by the increase in the sales of New Energy Vehicles (NEVs), increase in the cost of fuel vehicle engines caused by the tightening of fuel consumption regulations and the changes in purchase subsidy, purchase tax rate and value-added tax rate in the coming years
Summary
Market Penetration Rate Based on Nested Multinominal Logit Model. Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.