Abstract
Unlike multi-point die forming (MPDF), multi-point press forming (MPPF) takes full advantage of the flexibility of multi-point forming (MPF). In the process of MPPF, the punch elements always keep in contact with the sheet metal, developing instantaneous forming surfaces, which clamp and deform the plates. In this study, based on the spherical surfaces, the formability of both MPPF and MPDF were simulated through finite element software. The effects of the two methods on dimple, wrinkle and springback defect were comparatively analyzed. Also the shape error of MPPF was studied. We find MPPF can significantly inhibit dimple and wrinkle, thus obviously reducing the maximum strain and homogenizing the distributions of stress and strain of the parts. The largest vertical springback value decreases from 0.514mm to 0.257mm and the stress is released more completely after unloading. The edge effect reduces the curvature in the area far away from the center, greatly magnifying the shape error. The increase in the numbers of punch elements and in the dimensions of elastic cushions can significantly weaken the edge effect and improve the forming precision. These analyses show MPPF has better formability for metal sheets than MPDF.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.