Abstract

Multiple Hypothesis Solution Separation (MHSS) is the baseline algorithm for Advanced Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring (ARAIM), and it detects faults by comparing the test statistic with a threshold. However, the cuboid threshold structure of the MHSS fault monitoring baseline algorithm lacks omnidirectionality, which leads to low conformity between the threshold and the spatial distribution of the test statistic and to low fault monitoring accuracy. To resolve these problems, we analyzed the distribution of a test statistic for single-, double-, and triple-fault hypotheses. By extracting the eigenvectors and eigenvalues of the solution separating variance, we designed an omnidirectional threshold structure. The simulation verifies the effectiveness of the fault detection method by detecting faults from noise. The results show that the proposed method is more exact, stable, and applicable than the MHSS fault detection baseline.

Highlights

  • Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring (RAIM) is an important method of ensuring integrity

  • We can conclude that the detection area of the proposed threshold method was reduced by 25% compared to the Multiple Hypothesis Solution Separation (MHSS) fault detection (FD) baseline

  • The threshold structure of the MHSS fault monitoring baseline algorithm is cuboid, which means that the MHSS FD baseline compares the test statistics with a predetermined threshold in the east, north, and up directions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring (RAIM) is an important method of ensuring integrity. With the modernization of GPS and GLONASS and the development of Galileo and BDS, the number of GNSS satellites is increasing rapidly [2], and the requirements of higher accuracy and integrity are achieved using dual frequencies and multiple constellations. The future multiconstellation global navigation satellite system (GNSS) will provide a large number of redundant ranging signals, which will improve the Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring (RAIM) performance but will increase the probability of satellite faults [3]. Compared with RAIM, ARAIM can support multiconstellation and dual-frequency [4] signals. The ARAIM nominal performance and fault probability can be updated by integrity support messages to ensure the integrity of navigation services [5]

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call