Abstract

With the large-scale construction of urban rail transit, it will lead to the intersection and transfer of various lines, resulting in more transfer stations. The transfer station is a collection point for multiple subway lines, which is difficult to construct and has a high construction risk. The construction of the new subway station and the operation of the existing subway station are mutually influenced during the close-attached undercrossing construction. Considering the two objectives of ensuring the smooth operation of the existing subway station and the safe construction of the new subway station, this paper comprehensively analyzes the possible safety risk factors during the construction of the new subway station close-attached undercrossing the existing operating station and identifies 75 preliminary risk factors by means of literature review and on-site investigation. Then the Delphi Method and Entropy Weight Method are used to screen the preliminary risk factors, and the main risk factors with greater influence are retained, so that 49 key risk factors are obtained. According to the list of key risk factors, a safety risk assessment index system including 2 first-level indexes, 12 second-level indexes, and 49 third-level indexes is established. Based on the index system, this paper establishes a safety risk assessment model by using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Fuzzy Matter Element Method (FMEM). The model first calculates the weight of each index by using AHP, calculates the comprehensive correlation degree of each index by using FMEM, classifies the risk grade of each index according to the comprehensive correlation degree, and determines the risk grade of the project. Finally, the safety risk assessment model is applied to the Dongdalu Station project of Chengdu Rail Transit Line 8. The result shows that the risk grade of this project is moderate risk, which is basically consistent with the actual situation, indicating that the model has good practicability. In this paper, a new safety risk assessment model for subway close-attached undercrossing construction is proposed, which fills the gap in the field of safety risk assessment for the construction of the new subway station close-attached undercrossing the existing operating station.

Highlights

  • With the continuous progress of urbanization in China, the population density and traffic pressure are increasing

  • The weight of each index is calculated by Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), and the comprehensive correlation degree of each index corresponding to different risk grades is calculated by Fuzzy Matter Element Method (FMEM)

  • The assessment result is basically consistent with the actual engineering situation, which indicates that the construction safety risk assessment model has certain practicability

Read more

Summary

Introduction

With the continuous progress of urbanization in China, the population density and traffic pressure are increasing. In terms of specific engineering examples, due to the safety risk assessment before construction and good construction control measures during construction, in a South Korean project where the subway station undercrossed the existing subway, the settlement of the existing subway line was only 3mm during the whole construction process [9], which is lower than the 10mm required by China’s national normative standards [10]. Based on the risk dynamic analysis method, Guan Jifa [18] constructed a risk assessment system for a tunnel undercrossing the existing subway and put forward the idea that the settlement amount (the uplift amount) and settlement rate (the uplift rate) of the existing subway structure baseplate should be used as the main control indexes in the subway crossing project. It is necessary to put forward a risk assessment system suitable for the subway crossing project of new subway station closeattached undercrossing the existing operating station

Result analysis
B New subway station
Assessment Approach
Ventilation and signal system
Foundation pit excavation
Green construction
Track structure A3 Power supply system A4 Water supply and drainage system
B67 Emergency plan
Calculating the Correlation Function and Correlation
Case Study
Construction Safety Risk Assessment
Track structure A3 Power supply system
B75 B76 B77 B78 B79
Result Analysis
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call