Abstract

Based on the analysis of foreign classic maturity models and the actual situation of electrical engineering projects, this paper constructs a suitable three-dimensional project risk management maturity model and establishes a project risk management evaluation index system. Through fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method and analytic hierarchy process, the key element indicators are evaluated and weighted, and the maturity score is obtained, which finally reflects the maturity of project risk management. Finally, through empirical analysis, we found out the shortcomings of enterprise project risk management and proposed the direction for improvement.

Highlights

  • The theory and development status of project management maturity modelThe Project Management Maturity Model (PMMM) is a standard to help organizations measure project management capabilities, and it is a framework method for evaluating and improving project management

  • The research on the maturity model first started in 1987

  • The software capability maturity model integrated CMMI was developed by the Software Institute (SEI) of Carnegie Mellon University in the United States[2]

Read more

Summary

The theory and development status of project management maturity model

The Project Management Maturity Model (PMMM) is a standard to help organizations measure project management capabilities, and it is a framework method for evaluating and improving project management. It depicts the process by which a project system develops over time and its project management capabilities reach the highest level and reflects the ability to reliably achieve specific engineering goals in the face of unknown risks[1]. The problem that the management variables are difficult to be accurately and directly measured in the project management maturity evaluation is solved by them

Construction of project risk management maturity model
Project risk management maturity level classification
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Level 4
Level 5
Steps to establishing evaluation index system
A11 A12 A21 A22 A23 A24 A25 A26 A31 A32 A33 A34 A41 A42 A43
Determination of evaluation index weight
Calculation of evaluation result
A W Bi
Case Analysis

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.