Abstract

PurposeWhile quantification and performance measurement have proliferated widely in academia and the business world, management and organization scholars increasingly agree on the need for a more in-depth focus on the complex dynamics embedded in the construction, use and effects of quantitative measures (pertaining to the thread of research called ethnostatistics). This paper develops a pluralistic method for conducting ethnostatistical research in organizational settings. Whilst presenting practical techniques for conducting research in live settings, it also discusses how historical approaches which focus on source criticism and contextual reconstruction could overcome the limitations of ethnostatistics.Design/methodology/approachThe methodological approach of this paper encompasses an in-depth discussion of the ethnostatistical method, its underlying assumptions and its methodological limitations. Based on this analysis, the authors propose a pluralistic method (model) for conducting ethnostatistical research in organizational settings based on the integration of 1) research practices employed by one of the authors conducting ethnostatistical research in a large multinational organization and 2) best practices from ethnographic and historical research.FindingsThis paper suggests how historical approaches can successfully join ethnostatistical enquiries in an attempt to overcome some limitations in existing conventional methods. The developed framework explores four levels of analysis (ethnography, statistics at work, rhetoric of statistics and history of statistics) and suggests practical approaches for each level that can contribute to strengthening the research output and overcoming limitations when using ethnostatistics.Originality/valueThis paper contributes to the ethnostatistical field by discussing the intersection between history and ethnography and the ways for their complementary use in organizational and management research on quantification processes. As such it offers unique insights and hands-on experience from conducting ethnostatistical enquiries in live organizational settings.

Highlights

  • In the last couple of decades, demands for transparency, accountability and efficiency have resulted in the proliferation of measures crafted to evaluate the performance of both individuals and organizations

  • “by definition” application of the ethnostatistical method, we argue that the use of historical data as substitutions for conducting real-time ethnographies must be done with caution as it poses additional methodological concerns

  • Whilst we draw widely on the literature arguing that organizational scholars and historians can approach historical data in different ways, we find that resorting to historical methods could be a way of overcoming some limitations existing in ethnostatistics

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In the last couple of decades, demands for transparency, accountability and efficiency have resulted in the proliferation of measures crafted to evaluate the performance of both individuals and organizations. In management and organization studies, a specific focus on the complex dynamics of the construction, use and effects of quantitative measures has been proposed by ethnostatistics (Gephart, 2006, 1988). Ethnostatistics is “the study of the construction, interpretation, and display of statistics in quantitative social research” Ethnostatistics is an attempt “to bridge the gap between quantitative and qualitative research” The full terms of this licence may be seen at http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode

Objectives
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call