Abstract
For a well-known purpose in 2010-2015, Guba-Khachmaz RAEM, Tartar and RAEM Shamakhi TSB have been confirmed by numerous research findings in the field of mountain watering, in terms of the development of irrigation, the mountainous slopes include soybean, sugar beet, trees, and germination (barley, wheat, etc.), the microcirculation method was not cost-effective in terms of efficiency, and preventive measures such as surface soil wash, sliding, irrigation and drowning, erosion characteristic for mountainous terrain zones , which is of particular importance, confirms the feasibility study of the farm calculated with the following formula.
Highlights
The calculation of the economic efficiency of the use of the microscopy in terms of production experience with respect to the application of the application of the microscopy is considered to be one of the key factors
The course of the study: In accordance with the methodology for determining the importance of the application of new techniques and technology applied to the existing agricultural sector, the annual economic benefit obtained by the application of sugar beet micro-gradient is as follows: E = (TS2-w2)-(TS1-w,1)/a-2, (1) here w 1 and W 2 -1 hectares base case and new sources for the introduction of products owned by agricultural practices directly with the account mentioned costs; with USD
TS TS and1 2 -1 hectares base case and new sources of agricultural techniques involved, giving accounts belonging to the production plant; from USD
Summary
The calculation of the economic efficiency of the use of the microscopy in terms of production experience with respect to the application of the application of the microscopy is considered to be one of the key factors. The course of the study: In accordance with the methodology for determining the importance of the application of new techniques and technology applied to the existing agricultural sector, the annual economic benefit obtained by the application of sugar beet micro-gradient is as follows: E = (TS2-w2)-(TS1-w,1)/a-2, (1) here w 1 and W 2 -1 hectares base case and new sources for the introduction of products owned by agricultural practices directly with the account mentioned costs; with USD. This product is comparable to a 32.4% microscope option and down to the country's product range of 54.3 s / ha. In this difference, serious sources of water are effective.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
