Research Group-Led Undergraduate Research Program: Analyzing and Improving a Versatile Springboard for First-Year Undergraduates

Abstract

Increasing access to undergraduate research is critical in efforts to retain students pursuing careers in STEM. Alternatives to traditional research positions, such as course based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs), have played important roles in engaging more undergraduates in research. However, these opportunities are only a subset of possible nontraditional research experiences which can enrich the undergraduate experience. In this study, we critically examined and improved the research-group-led undergraduate research program (GURP) to better meet the needs of undergraduates seeking research. Specifically, we investigated if the program was successful with a greater diversity of data sets, if assessments of learning were consistent across different data sets and teaching environments, and if the program promoted student engagement in research. We have found that this model is scalable, robust, and adaptable to different implementations while producing consistent and positive learning outcomes for students. Especially remarkable are students’ increased self-identification as scientists and statistically significant gains in self-perceived competency across multiple domains of knowledge. This program model has shown promising results as a partially and fully online research experience for undergraduates and has benefited program alumni in their research careers. To assist research groups starting similar programs, we have created public data sets and instructional resources. We believe that GURP programs can work in a variety of situations and hope that they can become a tool to increase interest and build communities for young researchers.