Abstract

This article provides an analysis of how sixteen recently graduated master’s students from the Netherlands perceive research data management. It is important to study the master’s students’ attitudes towards this, as students in this phase prepare themselves for their career. Some of them might become future academics or policymakers, thus, potentially, the future advocates of good data management and reproducible science. In general, students were rather unsure what ‘data management’ meant and would often confuse it with data analysis, study design or methodology, or ethics and privacy. When students defined the concept, they focussed on privacy aspects. Concepts such as open data and the ‘FAIR’ principles were rarely mentioned, even though these are the cornerstones of contemporary data management efforts. In practice, the students managed their own data in an ad hoc way, and only a few of them worked with a clear data management plan. Illustrative of this is that half of the interviewees did not know where to find their data anymore. Furthermore, their study programmes had diverse approaches to data management education. Most of the classes offered were limited in scope. Nevertheless, the students seemed to be aware of the importance of data management and were willing to learn more about good data management practices. This report helps to catch an important first glimpse of how master’s students (from different scientific backgrounds) think about research data management. Only by knowing this, accurate measures can be taken to improve data management awareness and skills. The article also provides some useful recommendations on what such measures might be, and introduces some of the steps already taken by the Delft University of Technology (TU Delft).

Highlights

  • The adequate management of research data has always been an indispensable element of trustworthy scientific research, but the interest for research data management practices, skills and experiences has flourished in the last decade

  • The survey investigated the reasons behind such irreproducible research

  • In the State of Open Data Report, Fane et al (2019) found something similar, as they reported that more than 50% of the 8,500 researchers that responded to their questionnaire never heard of the FAIR principles

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The adequate management of research data has always been an indispensable element of trustworthy scientific research, but the interest for research data management practices, skills and experiences has flourished in the last decade. As Carlson et al (2011: 629) noted: ‘Researchers increasingly need to integrate the disposition, management and curation of their data into their current workflows, but it is not yet clear to what extent faculty and students are sufficiently prepared to take on these responsibilities’ This causes an interesting friction, because it was learned that most data management-related curricula are not openly accessible and are not targeted on students outside of information science programs (Piorun et al 2012: 47). Carlson & Stowell-Bracke (2013: 5), who interviewed master’s students in a water field station, argue that: ‘A significant gap in efforts to understand the practices of researchers through case studies, surveys or other means of investigation, is the overall lack of attention given to the role of graduate students and their work in generating, processing, analysing and managing data’. In the discussion (section IV), suggestions for follow up actions are included, together with some concrete steps already undertaken by TU Delft

Methodology
Limitations of the study
The interview findings
Findings
Discussion and final remarks
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call