Abstract
The article considered and refuted three myths prevalent within the psychotherapy literature of the time: the patient and therapist uniformity assumptions; the assumption of spontaneous remission of psychoneurotic disorders (as promulgated by Eysenck, 1952); and the belief that theoretical formulations of the time provided adequate paradigms for guiding psychotherapy research. The author proposed a new research paradigm (advocating increased use of ANOVA factorial designs) that requires specification of patient change variables (dependent variables), and of relevant patient, therapist, and intervention dimensions (independent variables), so that the field can begin to assess the central theoretical and research question: Which therapist behaviors are more effective with which type of patients?
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
