Abstract

ObjectivesLeft ventricular mass (LVM) at cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is a frequent end point in clinical trials in nephrology. Trial participants with end stage renal disease (ESRD) may have a greater frequency of incidental findings (IF). We retrospectively investigated prevalence of IF in previous research CMR and reviewed their subsequent impact on participants.MethodsBetween 2002 and 2006, 161 ESRD patients underwent CMR in a transplant assessment study. Images were used to assess LV mass and function. In the current study a radiologist reviewed the scans for IF. Review of patient records determined the subsequent clinical significance of IF.ResultsThere were 150 IF in 95 study participants. Eighty-four (56 %) were new diagnoses. One hundred and two were non-cardiac. Fifteen were suspicious of malignancy. There was a clinically significant IF for 14.9 % of the participants. In six cases earlier identification of an IF may have improved quality of life or survival.ConclusionsWithout radiology support clinically important IF may be missed on CMR. Patients undergoing CMR in trials should be counselled about the frequency and implications of IF. Patients with ESRD have a higher prevalence of IF than reported in other populations. Nephrology studies require mechanisms for radiologist reporting and strategies for dealing with IF.Key Points• Incidental findings on research cardiac magnetic resonance imaging can have significant consequences.• We considered incidental findings in historical renal cardiac resonance imaging clinical trials.• Incidental findings are common and important in the chronic kidney disease population.• Without radiology support, clinically significant incidental findings may be missed on imaging.• Study protocols, approvals and consent processes should take account of possible findings.

Highlights

  • Reduction in cardiac morbidity and mortality is of great importance in nephrology

  • We considered incidental findings in historical renal cardiac resonance imaging clinical trials

  • Without radiology support, clinically significant incidental findings may be missed on imaging

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Reduction in cardiac morbidity and mortality is of great importance in nephrology. Within the chronic kidney diseaseEur Radiol (2017) 27:315–324(CKD) population, increased left ventricular mass (LVM) is well established as a surrogate marker of cardiovascular risk [1]; reduction in LVM assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is a frequent primary end point in nephrology clinical trials [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9].Patients consenting to participate in clinical trials undergo CMR that would not otherwise be performed. Reduction in cardiac morbidity and mortality is of great importance in nephrology. (CKD) population, increased left ventricular mass (LVM) is well established as a surrogate marker of cardiovascular risk [1]; reduction in LVM assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is a frequent primary end point in nephrology clinical trials [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. Incidental findings (IF) on images obtained for research may have unexpected clinical consequences. The rate of IF in CMR performed for research purposes is less well established [14]. Findings in research CMR are important and current radiology guidelines reflect this [15]

Objectives
Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call