Abstract
WE are in substantial agreement with the views expressed by Mr. G. E. H. Foxon in NATURE of June 8, except that he has misinterpreted the penultimate paragraph of our original article1, as reference to it will show that it was not our intention to burke scientific debates. The inclusion of these would not be overlooked by an editorial board of the calibre envisaged by us. Our point was that votes of thanks and such superfluous matter or padding should be excised.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
