Abstract
J. H. (Henk) von Eije - University of Groningen, Faculty of Economics and Business. E-mail: j.h.von.eije@rug.nl
 Matthijs Suurmeijer - University of Groningen, Faculty of Economics and Business. Email: matthijs.suurmeijer@gmail.com
 Peter Smid - Dr, University of Groningen, Faculty of Economics and Business. E-mail: p.p.m.smid@eco.rug.nl
 Spending on R&D has grown faster than other investments. This may result in higher return and higher risk. We focus on the latter and examine how research and development (R&D) affects the risks of US firms. We analyze the impact on the firm’s beta, its systematic and idiosyncratic risk, and the combination of the latter two (total risk). Because investors prefer upside to downside risk, we also analyze whether downside risk is also influenced by R&D. We use panel and quantile regressions and control for dividend payouts, growth, leverage, asset liquidity, firm size, earnings variability, firm age and industry competition. We then show that the impact is positive and highly significant for beta, systematic risk and total risk. The impact on systematic risk contrasts to the finding by McAlister et al. (2007) who find that R&D insulates firms from market downturns and thereby lowers systematic risk. The increases in risks are, moreover, stronger at higher relative levels of R&D spending. Unfortunately for investors, downside risk is also increasing with relative R&D spending. The results may make it also more difficult for managers to defend R&D investments. R&D may indeed generate future returns, but also adds to the next year’s risk. The impact on systematic risk contrasts to the finding by McAlister et al. [2007] that R&D insulates firms from market downturns and thereby lowers systematic risk. While the magnitudes of the effects are small, the impact is relevant when compared with other accounting variables included in the model, especially for beta and systematic risk. Apart from this, there are strong indications that the hypothesized relationis non-linear.
Highlights
Research and development (R&D) investments may lead to innovative products and services and thereby to a competitive advantage
R&D projects may fail to result in output, and if there is output, there is uncertainty about the payoff because the pay-off of R&D projects depends on intermediate events and decisions (Perlitz, Peske, and Schrank, 1999)
These results are confirmed by Chambers, Jennings, and Thompson (2002), who indicate that the association between excess returns and levels of R&D investments stems from a risk factor associated with R&D
Summary
Research and development (R&D) investments may lead to innovative products and services and thereby to a competitive advantage. Hall (2002) indicates that there is information asymmetry, because it is difficult to distinguish between good and bad R&D intense projects, while there is an agency problem, because managers do not want to invest in risky R&D projects For these reasons investors might require a risk premium for high intensity R&D firms. Barth, Kasznik, and McNichols (2001) and Kothari, Laguerre, and Leone (2002) find that higher R&D investments are associated with more uncertainty about future earnings These results are confirmed by Chambers, Jennings, and Thompson (2002), who indicate that the association between excess returns and levels of R&D investments stems from a risk factor associated with R&D.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Journal of Corporate Finance Research / Корпоративные Финансы | ISSN: 2073-0438
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.