Abstract
L'A. defend la solution du paradoxe de Chisholm apportee par P. L. Mott dans le cadre de la logique deontique et de la logique des contrefacteuls de Lewis, contre les objections qui lui oppose J. W. Decew. Developpant le systeme de Mott a la lumiere de la theorie des actes individuels de D. Davidson et a la lumiere du calcul des predicats du premier ordre, l'A. montre que la logique des concepts normatifs permet de resoudre les problemes de la logique des obligations, et ainsi sauver la position contrefactuelle de Mott des critiques de W. Sinnot-Armstrong
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
