Rescue therapy with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil does not prevent deterioration of graft function in C4d-positive chronic allograft nephropathy

Abstract

Humoral alloresponses may contribute to chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) in a subset of kidney transplant recipients. For chronic humoral rejection, the efficacy of rescue therapy with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil has been suggested. Eleven recipients with C4d-positive CAN (index biopsy performed after a median of 3 years posttransplantation), who had been on cyclosporine A-based immunosuppression, were converted to tacrolimus, and if not part of basal therapy, to mycophenolate mofetil. We evaluated the effect of this tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil rescue therapy on clinical outcomes and on alloantibody formation detected with flow cytometric testing of panel-reactive antibody. Tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil rescue therapy (plus anti-rejection treatment in six recipients with additional signs of acute cellular rejection) failed to prevent progressive deterioration of graft function. Four patients returned to dialysis after 4 to 18 months. Serial post-transplant serology detected HLA class I and/or II reactivity in seven recipients. Tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil therapy did not affect the time course of alloantibody levels. One patient with C4d-positive transplant glomerulopathy, who did not respond to tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil rescue therapy, developed nephrotic-range proteinuria associated with a rapid decline of allograft function. Despite considerable reduction in alloantibody levels and nearly complete clearance of C4d deposits, immunoadsorption failed to prevent graft failure in this patient. Our data argue against the efficacy of tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil rescue therapy in established C4d-positive chronic allograft dysfunction. Prospective trials are needed to evaluate whether early initiation of this or other antihumoral strategies are capable of effectively preventing alloantibody-mediated chronic graft injury.