Abstract

Requirements engineering (RE) is the process of defining user requirements that are used as the main reference in the system development process. The quality of the RE results is measured based on the consistency and completeness of the requirements. The collection of requirements from multiple stakeholders can cause requirements conflict and have an impact on the inconsistency and incompleteness of the resulting requirements model. In this study, a method for automatic conflict detection and resolution in the Automatic Requirements Engineering Model (AREM) was developed. AREM is a model that automates the process of elicitation, analysis, validation, and requirements specification. The requirement conflict detection method was developed using an intelligent agent approach combined with a Weighted Product approach. Meanwhile, Conflict resolution is made automatically using a rule-based model and clustering method. Testing the ability of the method to detect and resolve conflicting requirements was carried out through five data sets of requirements from five system development projects. Based on the test results, it is known that the system is able to produce a set of objects that have conflicts in the data requirements. For conflict resolution, experiments were conducted with five conflict resolution scenarios. The experimental results show that the method is able to resolve conflicts by producing the highest completeness value, but the results of conflict resolution also produce a number of soft goals. The success of the method in detecting and resolving conflicts in the model is able to overcome the problem of inconsistencies and incompleteness in the requirements model.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call