Abstract

Systematic analysis of structural changes induced by activating mutations has been frequently utilized to study activation mechanisms of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). In the thyrotropin receptor and the lutropin receptor (LHR), a large number of naturally occurring mutations leading to constitutive receptor activation were identified. Saturating mutagenesis studies of a highly conserved Asp in the junction of the third intracellular loop and transmembrane domain 6 suggested a participation of this anionic residue in a salt bridge stabilizing the inactive receptor conformation. However, substitution of all conserved cationic residues at the cytoplasmic receptor surface did not support this hypothesis. Asp/Glu residues are a common motif at the N-terminal ends of alpha-helices terminating and stabilizing the helical structure (helix capping). Since Asp/Glu residues in the third intracellular loop/transmembrane domain 6 junction are not only preserved in glycoprotein hormone receptors but also in other GPCRs we speculated that this residue probably participates in an N-terminal helix-capping structure. Poly-Ala stretches are known to form and stabilize alpha-helices. Herein, we show that the function of the highly conserved Asp can be mimicked by poly-Ala substitutions in the LHR and thyrotropin receptor. CD and NMR studies of peptides derived from the juxtamembrane portion of the LHR confirmed the helix extension by the poly-Ala substitution and provided further evidence for an involvement of Asp in a helix-capping structure. Our data implicate that in addition to well established interhelical interactions the inactive conformation of GPCRs is also stabilized by specific intrahelical structures.

Highlights

  • G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs)1 comprise a large superfamily of integral membrane proteins that mediate transmembranous signal transduction of a remarkable diversity of

  • Because the replacement of Asp564 in the LHR by other amino acid residues except for Glu resulted in agonist-independent receptor activation, it was speculated that agonist- or mutation-induced disruption of a salt bridge involving this conserved Asp residue within the i3 loop contributes to lutropin/choriogonadotropin receptor; TFE, trifluoroethanol; TSHR, thyrotropin receptor; transmembrane domains (TMD), transmembrane domain; wt, wild type; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; IP, inositol phosphate

  • Because Asp/Glu residues in the i3 loop/TMD6 junction are conserved in glycoprotein hormone receptors and many other rhodopsin-like GPCRs, we speculate that the inactive receptor conformation depends on the stability of TMD6

Read more

Summary

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Generation of Mutant LHR and TSHR Genes—All LHR mutations (see Figs. 1 and 2) were introduced into LHR-pcDps [19], a mammalian expression vector containing the entire coding sequence of the human LHR, using a PCR-based site-directed mutagenesis and restriction fragment replacement strategy [25]. For cAMP assay, transfected cells were washed once in serum-free Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium containing 1 mM 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (Sigma), followed by incubation in the presence of the indicated concentrations of human choriogonadotropin (hCG; from pregnancy urine, 3,000 units/ mg, Sigma) or bovine thyrotropin (Sigma); for 1 h at 37 °C. The peptides were dissolved at a concentration of 0.2 mg/ml in pure water or in aqueous TFE solutions containing 50% TFE by volume As these solutions adopted acidic pH value, further measurements were performed in 65 mM phosphate buffer or in phosphate-buffered TFE solution at neutral pH. The starting conformation of the i1 loop, the i2 loop, and the first portion of the C-terminal tail comprising the putative i4 loop of the LHR were adopted from the NMR structure of the rhodopsin cytosolic loop peptide complex [6] as described for the V2 vasopressin receptor [35]. Molecular dynamics simulations were performed at 300 K for 200 ps, where only the helix stability was maintained by restraints for hydrogen bonds of the TMD backbones

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TABLE I Functional characterization of LHR Ala mutants
Increase in cAMP levels
TABLE II
Adenosine receptors Somatostatin receptors
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call