Abstract

AbstractUsing simulations, error propagation theory, and measurements from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), we determined the minimal signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) required for ocean color measurements and product uncertainties at different spatial and temporal scales. First, based on typical top‐of‐atmosphere (TOA) radiance over the ocean, we evaluate the uncertainties in satellite‐derived Rrs in the visible wavelengths (ΔRrs(vis)) due to sensor noise in both the near‐infrared (NIR) and the visible bands. While the former induces noise in Rrs(vis) through atmospheric correction, the latter has a direct impact on Rrs(vis). Such estimated uncertainties are compared with inherent ΔRrs(vis) uncertainties from in situ measurements and from the operational atmosphere correction algorithm. The comparison leads to a conclusion that once SNR(NIR) is above 600:1, an SNR(vis) better than 400:1 will not make a significant reduction in product uncertainties at pixel level under typical conditions for a solar zenith angle of 45°. Then, such uncertainties are found to decrease significantly in data products of oceanic waters when the 1 km pixels from individual images are binned to lower spatial resolution (e.g., 4 km) or temporal resolution (e.g., monthly). Although these findings do not suggest that passive ocean color sensors should have SNR(vis) around 400:1, they do support the argument for more trade space in higher spatial and/or spectral resolutions once this minimal 400:1 SNR(vis) requirement is met.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call