Abstract
This paper investigates the interaction of reputation and product liabilities from a new perspective. We introduce a reputation model in an experience good market with imperfect monitoring, in which reputation incentives without product liability are not sufficient for inducing a desired outcome. Even a firm with high market reputation will cheat consumers, and the reputation will eventually collapse. We then introduce two product liabilities into the reputation model: strict liability and negligence rule . It is shown that under certain conditions, these two liabilities can both improve firms’ incentives and final outcomes. What is the best product liability depends on the costs of firms and courts as well as courts’ professional level. The paper also sheds light on which liability regime is optimal in this reputational setting. • We investigate the interaction of reputation and product liabilities from a new perspective. • We introduce a reputation model in an experience good market with imperfect monitoring, in which reputation incentives without product liability are not sufficient for inducing a desired outcome. • Under certain conditions, strict liability and negligence rule can both improve firms’ incentives and final outcomes. • What is the best product liability depends on the costs of firms and courts as well as courts’ professional level.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.