Abstract

BackgroundPrevious studies have shown that reproductive factors are differentially associated with breast cancer (BC) risk by subtypes. The aim of this study was to investigate associations between reproductive factors and BC subtypes, and whether these vary by age at diagnosis.MethodsWe used pooled data on tumor markers (estrogen and progesterone receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)) and reproductive risk factors (parity, age at first full-time pregnancy (FFTP) and age at menarche) from 28,095 patients with invasive BC from 34 studies participating in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC). In a case-only analysis, we used logistic regression to assess associations between reproductive factors and BC subtype compared to luminal A tumors as a reference. The interaction between age and parity in BC subtype risk was also tested, across all ages and, because age was modeled non-linearly, specifically at ages 35, 55 and 75 years.ResultsParous women were more likely to be diagnosed with triple negative BC (TNBC) than with luminal A BC, irrespective of age (OR for parity = 1.38, 95% CI 1.16–1.65, p = 0.0004; p for interaction with age = 0.076). Parous women were also more likely to be diagnosed with luminal and non-luminal HER2-like BCs and this effect was slightly more pronounced at an early age (p for interaction with age = 0.037 and 0.030, respectively). For instance, women diagnosed at age 35 were 1.48 (CI 1.01–2.16) more likely to have luminal HER2-like BC than luminal A BC, while this association was not significant at age 75 (OR = 0.72, CI 0.45–1.14). While age at menarche was not significantly associated with BC subtype, increasing age at FFTP was non-linearly associated with TNBC relative to luminal A BC. An age at FFTP of 25 versus 20 years lowered the risk for TNBC (OR = 0.78, CI 0.70–0.88, p < 0.0001), but this effect was not apparent at a later FFTP.ConclusionsOur main findings suggest that parity is associated with TNBC across all ages at BC diagnosis, whereas the association with luminal HER2-like BC was present only for early onset BC.

Highlights

  • Previous studies have shown that reproductive factors are differentially associated with breast cancer (BC) risk by subtypes

  • Parous women were more likely to be diagnosed with triple negative BC (TNBC) than with luminal A BC, irrespective of age (OR for parity = 1.38, 95% CI 1.16–1.65, p = 0.0004; p for interaction with age = 0.076)

  • While age at menarche was not significantly associated with BC subtype, increasing age at first full-time pregnancy (FFTP) was non-linearly associated with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) relative to luminal A BC

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Previous studies have shown that reproductive factors are differentially associated with breast cancer (BC) risk by subtypes. Analyses from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC) showed, for instance, that nulliparity and a later age at first full-time pregnancy (FFTP) increase the risk of ER-positive BC, but not ER-negative BC [3]. Subsequent full-term pregnancies exert a similar but quantitatively much less important effect, which is a likely reflection of the protective differentiation of breast cells already induced by the FFTP [7]. An FFTP offers long-term protection against BC, pregnancy is associated with a transient increased BC risk postpartum, which could be due to pregnancy-related stimulation of pre-existent malignant clones [7, 10, 11]. The protective effect of the FFTP is found to be greater later in life [12], which according to a hypothesis by Russo et al can be explained by the fact that several breast tumors are already initiated before the pregnancy, i.e., before the FFTP can induce its protective effect [4, 5]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call