Abstract

AbstractTheory predicts that sexual differences in reproductive strategies arise because of differences in the magnitude of investment made by males and females in reproduction. In some bushcrickets, the typical sex role of competitive male and choosy female is reversed when populations are subject to nutrient stress. Here I present an energetic analysis of reproduction for the role reversing bushcricket, Kawanaphila nartee, that supports the contention that this sex role reversal is a consequence of reversal in the pattern of relative reproductive investment. When fed ad libitum, males spent 16% of their daily energy reserves on the spermatophore compared with 26% spent on calling to attract a mate. Females spent 29% of their daily energy reserves in producing and laying eggs. However, when allowed only limited access to food, female expenditure in eggs was reduced to 23% of daily reserves while male expenditure remained unchanged. After accounting for the incorporation of male nutrients into eggs, female energy expenditure in reproduction exceeded male expenditure when animals were fed ad libitum, but male expenditure exceeded female expenditure when diet was limited. This role reversal in relative energy expenditure that is associated with courtship role reversal supports classical and contemporary theories on the control of sexual selection.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call