Abstract
The offline evaluation of recommender systems is typically based on accuracy metrics such as the Mean Absolute Error (MAE) and the Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), while on the other hand Precision and Recall is used to measure the quality of the top-N recommendations. However, it is difficult to reproduce the results since there are different libraries that can be used for running experiments and also within the same library there are many different settings that if not taken into consideration when replicating the result might vary. In this paper, we show that it is challenging to reproduce results using a different library but with the use of the same library an explanation based approach can be used to assist in the reproducibility of experiments. Our proposed approach has been experimentally evaluated using a real dataset and the results show that it is both practical and effective.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.