Reproducibility, repeatability, correlation and measurement error.

Abstract

CorrespondenceReproducibility, repeatability, correlation and measurement errorS HalliganS HalliganSearch for more papers by this authorPublished Online:5 Mar 2014https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.75.890.750193SectionsPDF/EPUBFull Text ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail About References 1 Gillard JH, Antoun NM, Burnet NG, Pickard JD. Reproducibility of quantitative CT perfusion imaging. Br J Radiol 2001;74:552–5. Link ISI, Google Scholar2 British Standards Institution. Precision of test methods, part 1: guide for the determination of repeatability and reproducibility for a standard test method. BS 5497, Part 1. London: BSI, 1979. Google Scholar3 Bland JM, Altman DG. Measurement error and correlation coefficients. BMJ 1996;313:41–2. Crossref Medline, Google Scholar4 Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;i:307–10. Crossref, Google Scholar5 Bland JM, Altman DG. Measurement error. BMJ 1996;313:744–53. Crossref Medline, Google Scholar6 Murray GD, Miller R. Statistical comparison of two methods of clinical measurement. Br J Surg 1990;77:385–7. Crossref Medline ISI, Google Scholar Previous article Next article FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited bySingle-replicate longitudinal data analysis in the presence of multiple instrumental measurement errorsComputers & Industrial Engineering, Vol. 141Longitudinal MRI data analysis in presence of measurement error but absence of replicates2 February 2018 | IISE Transactions on Healthcare Systems Engineering, Vol. 8, No. 2Test–retest: Agreement or reliability?12 October 2016 | Methodological Innovations, Vol. 9Test–retest reliability of diffusion tensor imaging of the liver at 3.0 T25 November 2014 | La radiologia medica, Vol. 120, No. 6Dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography to assess early activity of cetuximab in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neckRadiology and Oncology, Vol. 49, No. 1Reproducibility of oscillometrically measured arterial stiffness indices: Results of the SAPALDIA 3 cohort study16 January 2015 | Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation, Vol. 75, No. 2Density-based MDCT quantification of lobar lung volumes: a study of inter- and intraobserver reproducibility22 February 2010 | La radiologia medica, Vol. 115, No. 4Simultaneous measurement of noise and spatial resolution in PET phantom images28 January 2010 | Physics in Medicine and Biology, Vol. 55, No. 4Applications of the Repeatability of Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers: A Review of Statistical Analysis of Repeat Data SetsTranslational Oncology, Vol. 2, No. 4Repeatability of 18 F-FDG PET in a Multicenter Phase I Study of Patients with Advanced Gastrointestinal Malignancies16 September 2009 | Journal of Nuclear Medicine, Vol. 50, No. 10Whole-Tumor Perfusion CT Parameters and Glucose Metabolism Measurements in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinomas: A Pilot Study Using Combined Positron-Emission Tomography/CT Imaging15 May 2008 | American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol. 29, No. 7Quantitative Tumor Perfusion Assessment with Multidetector CT: Are Measurements from Two Commercial Software Packages Interchangeable?Radiology, Vol. 242, No. 3Are Two-dimensional CT Measurements of Small Noncalcified Pulmonary Nodules Reliable?Radiology, Vol. 231, No. 2Pulmonary Nodules: Preliminary Experience with Three-dimensional EvaluationRadiology, Vol. 231, No. 2 Volume 75, Issue 890February 2002Pages: 105-197 © The British Institute of Radiology History ReceivedSeptember 11,2001AcceptedSeptember 17,2001Published onlineMarch 05,2014 Metrics Download PDF