Abstract

Background: 3D speckle-tracking echocardiography (3D-STE) is a novel method to quantify left ventricular (LV) mechanical dyssynchrony. 3D-STE is influenced by image quality, but studies on the magnitude of its effect on 3D-STE derived LV systolic dyssynchrony indices (SDIs) and their test-retest reproducibility are limited.Methods: 3D-STE was performed in two groups, each comprising 18 healthy volunteers with good echocardiographic windows. In study 1, optimal and inferior-quality images, by intentionally poor echocardiographic technique, were acquired. In study 2, sub-optimal quality images were acquired by impairing ultrasound propagation using neoprene rubber sheets (thickness 2, 3, and 4 mm) mimicking mildly, moderately, and severely impaired images, respectively. Measures (normalized to cardiac cycle duration) were volume- and strain-based SDIs defined as the standard deviation of time to minimum segmental values, and volume- and strain-derived dispersion indices. For both studies test-retest reproducibility was assessed.Results: Test-retest reproducibility was better for most indices when restricting the analysis to good quality images; nevertheless, only volume-, circumferential strain-, and principal tangential strain-derived LV dyssynchrony indices achieved fair to good reliability. There was no evidence of systematic bias due to sub-optimal quality image. Volume-, circumferential strain-, and principal tangential strain-derived SDIs correlated closely. Radial strain- and longitudinal strain-SDI correlated moderately or weakly with volume-SDI, respectively.Conclusions: Sub-optimal image quality compromised the reliability of 3D-STE derived dyssynchrony indices but did not introduce systematic bias in healthy individuals. Even with optimal quality images, only 3D-STE indices based on volume, circumferential strain and principal tangential strain showed acceptable test-retest reliability.

Highlights

  • Synchronous contraction is important for overall left ventricular (LV) systolic performance [1]

  • There was no evidence of systematic bias due to sub-optimal image quality in any of 3D-speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE) derived LV dyssynchrony indices in study 1 (Table 3)

  • We found that suboptimal image quality did not introduce a systematic bias on 3D speckle-tracking echocardiography (3D-STE) derived strain-based LV dyssynchrony indices, there was some evidence of underestimation of volume-based dyssynchrony indices with poorer image quality

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Synchronous contraction is important for overall left ventricular (LV) systolic performance [1]. LVMD assessed using different imaging modalities has been shown to be an independent predictor of poor prognosis in cardiac disease [3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. It may have advantages in guiding cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), current guidelines are still based on electrical dyssynchrony criteria [10]. 3D speckle-tracking echocardiography (3D-STE) is a novel method to quantify left ventricular (LV) mechanical dyssynchrony.

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call