Abstract

<h3>Objectives</h3> Evaluate the reproducibility and reliability of a Cefbot-AI software in the identification of cephalometric points in lateral cephalometric radiographs. <h3>Study Design</h3> Thirty lateral cephalometric radiographs obtained with Orthophos XG5/Ceph (Dentsply Sirona, Pennsylvania) were selected, and 19 cephalometric points were marked on each radiograph by a control (ECont) and a calibrated (ECal) examiner and by the Cefbot-AI software (RadioMemory, Belo Horizonte, Brazil). Reliability was assessed by a new analysis of the radiographs 15 days after the first record. Statistical significance was set at <i>P</i> < .05. <h3>Results</h3> Excellent reliability was observed in the landmarks of all examiners, as well as in those made by Cefbot-AI (mean intraclass correlation coefficient >0.93). As for reproducibility, comparisons between the performance of ECont and ECal revealed some cephalometric points with a statistically significant difference on the <i>x</i>-axis, namely, S (<i>P</i> = .048), Po (<i>P</i> < .001), and ENA (<i>P</i> = .013). ECont and Cefbot revealed only 1 point, Or (<i>P</i> = .010), with a statistically significant difference on the <i>x</i>-axis. No statistically significant differences were found on the <i>y</i>-axis. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Excellent reliability and good reproducibility of Cefbot-AI was observed, suggesting that Cefbot is an excellent auxiliary tool for cephalometric analysis but still dependent on professional assessment for clinical use.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call