Abstract
BackgroundThe pathologic assessments of tumor response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) are critical to improving the prognostic stratification for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Here we clarified the utility of our new grading system based on the area of residual tumor (ART) as compared to existing systems, such as the College of American Pathologists (CAP) and MD Anderson (MDA) score. Methods: Eight reviewers individually evaluated the tumor regression grade of 30 patients with PDAC based on three types of grading systems. The interobserver concordance and clinicopathological characteristics were compared between the three systems. Results: The interobserver concordance (kappa value) of the ART, CAP, and MDA score were 0.61, 0.48, and 0.53, respectively. Discrepant cases, which were 27% of the cases, exhibited smaller tumor and tumor bed sizes than concordant cases. The reduction in tumor size evaluated by microscopy showed a correlation with the rate of change in carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level, CA19-9 level, and tumor size on computed tomography (CT). The ART score was correlated with the tumor size on CT before and after NACRT and disease-free survival. The CAP and MDA scores were not associated with prognosis. Conclusion: The ART grading system may be the most practical system to assess the tumor response in post-NACRT resections of PDAC.
Accepted Version (
Free)
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
