Abstract
The effects of climate change and urban heat islands are predicted to grow and compound in the future. In the context of urban heat becoming an increasing problem, this article explores the extent to which this is recognised in media. Our findings show that the issue of the urban heat island (UHI) effect appeared on media agendas over the period studied and that predominantly the issue of UHI was framed in four ways. The top-down mitigation frame focused on the proactive approach of local governments while highlighting inaction at state and national levels. The bottom-up mitigation frame presented a patchwork approach to dealing with UHI with a positive focus on the mitigation actions of individuals and the private sector, while the risks and vulnerabilities frame looked at the distribution and mapping of the health risks posed by the phenomena. However, the media analysis also highlighted two factors which have potentially negative consequences regarding science communication and citizen understandings of science. These are the ambiguous and/or cautious manner in which the UHI effect is referred to and the use of UHI as an alternative argument to climate change in the climate change debate frame.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.