Abstract

Linguistic description and language modelling need to be formally sound and complete while still being supported by data. We present a linguistic framework that bridges such formal and descriptive requirements, based on the representation of syntactic information by means of local properties. This approach, called Property Grammars, provides a formal basis for the description of specific characteristics as well as entire constructions. In contrast with other formalisms, all information is represented at the same level (no property playing a more important role than another) and independently (any property being evaluable separately). As a consequence, a syntactic description, instead of a complete hierarchical structure (typically a tree), is a set of multiple relations between words. This characteristic is crucial when describing unrestricted data, including spoken language. We show in this paper how local properties can implement any kind of syntactic information and constitute a formal framework for the representation of constructions (seen as a set of interacting properties). The Property Grammars approach thus offers the possibility to integrate the description of local phenomena into a general formal framework.

Highlights

  • Linguistic description and language modelling need to be formally sound and complete while still being supported by data

  • Several works are considered by Pullum and Scholz (2001) to exhibit the seeds of Model-Theoretic Syntax (MTS), in particular HPSG and Construction Grammars (Fillmore 1988; Kay and Fillmore 1999)

  • SGBG is motivated by providing a formal basis for Construction Grammars, paving the way towards modelling language usage

Read more

Summary

Philippe Blache

Linguistic description and language modelling need to be formally sound and complete while still being supported by data. We present a linguistic framework that bridges such formal and descriptive requirements, based on the representation of syntactic information by means of local properties This approach, called Property Grammars, provides a formal basis for the description of specific characteristics as well as entire constructions. SGBG is motivated by providing a formal basis for Construction Grammars, paving the way towards modelling language usage It starts to fulfill the MTS requirements in that it proposes a monotonic system of declarative constraints, representing different sources of linguistic information and their interaction. No description can be given when no such structures can be built This is a severe restriction both for theoretical and cognitive reasons: one of the requirements of MTS is to represent all linguistic domains independently of each other (in what Pullum and Scholz 2001 call a non-holistic manner). These pairings result from the convergence of several properties or characteristics, as illustrated in the following examples: 1. Covariational conditional construction The Xer the Yer: “The more you watch the less you know”

Representing syntax by means of properties
The book that
Constructions as sets of properties
The structure of lexical entries
The role of features
Prep mod
Construction type Nominal
The man
Adj l d
Det the l d c
NP:OBJ
Noun Pct
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call