Abstract
A critical issue facing groundwater flow models is the estimation of representative hydraulic conductivity assigned to the model units. In this study, an experiment-based, high-resolution hydraulic conductivity map offers a test case to evaluate this parameter. Various hydrogeological units are distinguished, each is of irregular shape with distinct heterogeneity pattern created by physical sedimentation. Extending a previous study which used numerical upscaling to compute equivalent conductivities for these units (at two upscaling scales) [Zhang, Y., Gable, C.W., Person, M., 2006. Equivalent hydraulic conductivity of an experimental stratigraphy – implications for basin-scale flow simulations. Water Resources Research 42, W05404. doi:10.1029/2005WR004720], this study compares them with local statistics and effective conductivities predicted by a stochastic theory. Results suggest that for a system with moderate ln K variance (4.07) and low topographic slope (∼1°), the arithmetic mean ( K A ) provides a good estimate for the maximum principal component ( K max ) of the equivalent conductivity. The minimum principal component ( K min ) lies between the harmonic and geometric means: its closeness to the geometric mean is affected by heterogeneity pattern and upscaling scale. Using K max (alternatively, the arithmetic mean), geometric mean, and ln( K ) variance, the stochastic theory predicts a K min that is consistent with the up-scaled value. Similarly, knowing K min , K max predicted by theory is also consistent with the up-scaled value. For most deposits (some with variance greater than 1), a low-variance version of the theory is more accurate than a high-variance version. However, the increase of topographic slope (to ∼4°) and total ln K variance (to 16) result in increased deviation of K max from K A . High variance also results in significantly larger anisotropy ratio, possibly due to the dominance of preferential flow. Finally, for select units, equivalent conductivity exhibits scale effect. Field scale representative elementary volume thus does not exist and upscaling the full unit is necessary to obtain the representative conductivity.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.