Abstract

Protected areas are increasingly considered to play a key role in the global maintenance of ecosystem processes and the ecosystem services they provide. It is thus vital to assess the extent to which existing protected area systems represent those services. Here, for the first time, we document the effectiveness of the current Chilean protected area system and its planned extensions in representing both ecosystem services (plant productivity, carbon storage and agricultural production) and biodiversity. Additionally, we evaluate the effectiveness of protected areas based on their respective management objectives. Our results show that existing protected areas in Chile do not contain an unusually high proportion of carbon storage (14.9%), agricultural production (0.2%) or biodiversity (11.8%), and also represent a low level of plant productivity (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index of 0.38). Proposed additional priority sites enhance the representation of ecosystem services and biodiversity, but not sufficiently to attain levels of representation higher than would be expected for their area of coverage. Moreover, when the species groups were assessed separately, amphibians was the only one well represented. Suggested priority sites for biodiversity conservation, without formal protection yet, was the only protected area category that over-represents carbon storage, agricultural production and biodiversity. The low representation of ecosystem services and species’ distribution ranges by the current protected area system is because these protected areas are heavily biased toward southern Chile, and contain large extents of ice and bare rock. The designation and management of proposed priority sites needs to be addressed in order to increase the representation of ecosystem services within the Chilean protected area system.

Highlights

  • Ecosystem services, the benefits that humans derive from ecosystems, are vital for sustaining human well-being [1,2,3]

  • The bulk of carbon storage, net primary production and agricultural production were located in the south-central zone of Chile (Fig. 2)

  • Areas with the highest values of Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) were located between 35u–43u S, in the southerncentral coastal range (Fig. 2A)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The benefits that humans derive from ecosystems, are vital for sustaining human well-being [1,2,3]. The representation of three ecosystem services - plant productivity, carbon storage, agricultural production - and biodiversity is assessed under three protection scenarios. When the species groups were assessed separately, amphibians were best represented by different protected area categories: Ministry of Heritage lands (2.36), National Parks (1.06), Nature Sanctuaries (2.92), and PSBC (5.46).

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call