Abstract

In this article we present a new representation-free formalism, which can significantly simplify the analysis of interferometers comprised of atoms moving in time-dependent linear potentials. We present a methodology for the construction of two pairs of time-dependent functions that, once determined, lead to two conditions for the closing of the interferometer, and determine the phase and the contrast of the resultant interference. Using this new formalism, we explore the dependency of the interferometer phase on the interferometer time T for different atom interferometers. By now, it is well established that light pulse atom interferometers of the type first demonstrated by Kasevich and Chu (1991 Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 181–4; 1992 Appl. Phys. B 54, 321–32), henceforth referred to as Mach–Zehnder (MZ) atom interferometers, have a phase scaling as T2. A few years ago, McDonald et al (2014 Europhys. Lett. 105, 63001) have experimentally demonstrated a novel type of atom interferometer, referred to as the continuous-acceleration bloch (CAB) interferometer, where the phase reveals a mixed scaling which is governed by a combination of T2 and T3. Moreover, we have recently proposed a different type of atom interferometer (Zimmermann et al 2017 Appl. Phys. B 123, 102), referred to as the T3-interferometer, which has a pure T3 scaling, as demonstrated theoretically. Finally, we conclude that the CAB interferometer can be shown to be a hybrid of the standard MZ interferometer and the T3-interferometer.

Highlights

  • Atom interferometers [1,2,3] and in particular light pulse atom interferometers [4, 5] were first demonstrated in 1991

  • An intuitive representation-free description of atom interferometers In this article we develop a novel formalism based on the ideas and results presented in [80,81,82], valid for atoms moving in any time- and state-dependent linear potential

  • As a result of our formalism, we present a simple explanation of the different scalings of the interferometer phase with respect to the total interferometer time T

Read more

Summary

July 2019

America 3 Institute of Quantum Technologies, German Aerospace Center (DLR), D-89069 Ulm, Germany. Original content from this 5 Department of Physics, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA 93943, United States of America work may be used under 6 Author to whom any correspondence should be addressed.

Introduction
Atom interferometers
Building blocks of atom interferometers
Beam-splitter and mirror pulses
Interferometer sequence
Interferometer contrast and phase
Schematic rules
A comparison of three atom interferometers
T3-interferometer
Discussion
Interpretation of the interferometer phase
Conclusion
Contrast and phase of a closed interferometer
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call