Abstract
Legislation requires the reporting to regulatory authorities of incidents in which patients have been exposed to ionizing radiation to an extent "much greater than that intended". The authorities have published guidance on what is considered to meet this requirement. However, there is still some confusion regarding, particularly, the necessity to report some unintended doses. It is believed that there is a disproportionate amount of resource spent investigating some unintended exposures because all such exposures will have an effective overexposure factor of infinity, irrespective of the magnitude of the dose and the associated risk. This paper proposes changing the definitions of "overexposure" and "unintended exposure" and the adoption of a reporting process based upon risk assessment. All records and data would be collected and, if required, reported, but investigation of individual incidents would take place only for incidents carrying a greater risk than 1 in 10,000.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.