Abstract

Injury to the lower urinary tract is a potential complication in all major vaginal and urogynecologic surgical procedures. Several authors have recommended the routine use of intraoperative cystoscopy during urogynecologic procedures. To evaluate possible injury to the lower urinary tract during intraoperative cystoscopy, the concomitant use of diuretics with indigo carmine dye has been advocated; efflux of dye is hypothesized to indicate functional patency of the urinary tract. This report describes a case in which a partial ureteral obstruction was present at the time of intraoperative cystoscopy--despite the observation of diuresis caused by furosemide. This case indicates that the efflux of indigo carmine-stained urine from both ureteral orifices is not conclusive evidence of the absence of ureteral insult during intraoperative cystoscopy.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.