Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the use of a digital continuous speech recognition (CSR) in the field of radiology could lead to relevant time savings in generating a report. A CSR system (SP6000, Philips, Eindhoven, The Netherlands) for German was used to transform fluently spoken sentences into text. Two radiologists dictated a total of 450 reports on five radiological topics. Two typists edited those reports by means of conventional typing using a text editor (WinWord 6.0, Microsoft, Redmond, Wash.) installed on an IBM-compatible personal computer (PC). The same reports were generated using the CSR system and the performance of both systems was then evaluated by comparing the time needed to generate the reports and the error rates of both systems. In addition, the error rate of the CSR system and the time needed to create the reports was evaluated. The mean error rate for the CSR system was 5.5%, and the mean error rate for conventional typing was 0.4%. Reports edited with the CSR, on average, were generated 19% faster compared with the conventional text-editing method. However, the amount of error rates and time savings were different and depended on topics, speakers, and typists. Using CSR the maximum time saving achieved was 28% for the topic sonography. The CSR system was never slower, under any circumstances, than conventional typing on a PC. When compared with a conventional manual typing method, the CSR system proved to be useful in a clinical setting and saved time in generating radiological reports. The amount of time saved, however, greatly depended on the performance of the typist, the speaker, and on stored vocabulary provided by the CSR system.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call