Abstract
Most cuff erosions occur on the dorsal aspect of the urethra, suggesting missed injury during mobilization of the urethra from tissues behind it as a common etiology. We agree that most early urethral erosions result from inadvertent injury. However, preservation of urethral blood supply by minimizing mobilization is felt to be a positive attribute of this narrower cuff device. Preservation of urethral vascularity is thought to be of prime importance, especially in cases with an initial compromise to the blood flow secondary to radiation, trauma, or previous urethral surgeries. Of course, using meticulous surgical technique during circumferential mobilization of the urethra and being cognizant of the possibility of injury are prudent practices for minimizing early erosion. Editorial CommentUrologyVol. 77Issue 1PreviewIn comparing the tape mechanical occlusive device (TMOD) with the artificial urinary sphincter, the authors mention that the narrow width of the occlusion tape requires less dissection around the bulbar urethra. They believe this might reduce the risk of urethral injury during urethral mobilization, and this, in turn, might encourage more urologists to use this device. Full-Text PDF
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
